Fiat Freemont JC
Weaknesses, engine ratings and buying advice
The Fiat Freemont JC (2011–2016) is a rebadged Dodge Journey sold in Europe under a Fiat badge. Same platform, same engines, same interior — different grille. That matters because the Dodge Journey earned a poor reliability reputation in the US, and the Freemont inherits a share of those issues, particularly around the automatic transmission and AWD drivetrain.
Engine choice defines the ownership experience. The 2.0 MultiJet diesel (140 PS / 170 PS) is the sensible pick for European buyers — Fiat's own engine, well-known to independent workshops, reasonable fuel consumption. The 170 PS version with AWD is the most capable variant but pairs with a ZF automatic that needs ATF+4 fluid changes every 60,000 km — skip this and the gearbox deteriorates fast. The 3.6 V6 Pentastar (280 PS) is an American engine dropped into a European SUV: powerful, heavy on fuel (12–14 l/100 km), expensive to run, and the alternator fails reliably between 70,000 and 100,000 km. The 2.4 Tigershark (170 PS) is the worst pick — Chrysler's most troubled four-cylinder, with documented oil consumption issues and a gearbox that has failed completely at 67,000 km, costing owners €10,300 at the dealership. That is not a typo.
The seven documented vehicle weaknesses are spread across suspension, electrics, body, HVAC, steering, AWD drivetrain, and brakes. None is catastrophic on its own, but the battery drain from keyless entry / Bluetooth module is a persistent annoyance — the CAN bus fails to sleep, especially when water gets into door handle sensors. Software update Campaign 5665 fixed many early (2011–2012) cars; later builds had it pre-installed. The control arm rubber bushes cause severe steering wheel vibration at 90–130 km/h, worse in heat — Fiat fitted excessively soft bushings on some production runs. The tailgate wiring loom breaks from repeated opening cycles; Metzger repair kit (Art. 2320088, ~€60) is the standard fix, though it can recur. The AC compressor failure is documented at high mileage (260,000 km in one case) — aftermarket unit ~€400, but the system must be flushed to remove metal debris.
The AWD driveshaft and viscous coupling issue (grinding when cornering under load) is genuinely tricky — forum consensus found no reliable permanent fix short of differential replacement at ~€1,400, which sometimes didn't even resolve it. Multiple owners disconnected AWD entirely rather than continue throwing money at the rear drivetrain.
The Freemont is genuinely large for a European-market SUV — 7-seat capability, Dodge Journey interior, and reasonable pricing second-hand. The 2.0 MultiJet diesel (140 PS, manual, FWD) is the mechanically simplest configuration and the one to look for. Avoid the 2.4 Tigershark entirely.
Test-drive checklist: Steering wheel vibration at 90–130 km/h (control arm bushings). Grinding when turning sharply under power in AWD variants (viscous coupling / driveshaft). Heavy or jerky power steering (hydraulic fluid loss). Battery: does the car start after a week of sitting? Rear wiper and tailgate release working? AC blowing cold? On automatic variants: any shuddering, delayed shifts, or limp-mode symptoms?
2026 market: 2.0 MultiJet 140 PS manual FWD in decent condition: €5,500–9,500. AWD diesel 170 PS: €7,000–12,000 (but check ATF service history). 3.6 V6: €6,000–11,000 — cheap for a reason. 2.4 Tigershark: avoid unless the automatic transmission history is fully documented. Insider pick: 2014–2016 2.0 MultiJet 170 PS manual AWD, full service history including ATF change, below 130,000 km — the latest production cars had most early software issues resolved, and the diesel AWD is the most capable variant when maintained correctly.
280 PS
Freemont · Benzin
V6 Power in the American
Decent280 PS
3.6L V6 Pentastar Benzin
4 weaknesses
Stay Away!Engine Overview
The Fiat Freemont JC is available with 3 engine variants — from 136 to 280 hp.
Sporty 2.0 MultiJet in the Bravo with turbo and DPF weaknesses; better on long trips than the 1.9.
- !! Turbocharger failure from 80,000 km
The turbocharger can fail prematurely in short-trip operation or with insufficient maintenance. Documented failures at as little as 27,000 km. Interaction with DPF blockage accelerates wear.
Symptoms: Loud bang under load, grinding noise on acceleration, complete power loss, engine warning light - !! EGR valve faulty from 80,000 km
The EGR valve is a documented weak point on all MultiJet engines in the Fiat Bravo. When it fails, the blocked EGR passage secondarily causes DPF clogging.
Symptoms: Poor throttle response, juddering, engine warning light, EGR fault code - !! Particulate filter clogged from 100,000 km
The DPF cannot actively regenerate in frequent city driving on short trips. After the check engine light is ignored, the vehicle enters limp mode. Problems can recur within a few hundred kilometres.
Symptoms: DPF engine warning light, limp mode after 150–200 km, fuel ingress into oil
+ 1 more engine weaknesses + vehicle weaknesses
The 2.0L Tigershark is more solid than the 2.4 MultiAir, but shares some structural risks; sold primarily in America in the Freemont.
- !! Overheating Risk from Cooling System Weakness from 90,000 km
Like the 2.4L Tigershark, the ED3 cooling circuit can fail due to ageing thermostats or leaking connections, leading to overheating if unnoticed.
Symptoms: Coolant temperature gauge rising above normal, coolant level dropping - !! Automatic Transmission Failure (€10,300 Replacement Risk) from 70,000 km
The 6-speed automatic can fail completely — one documented case at 67,000 km, two months after warranty expired, required full transmission replacement. Dealer quote: €10,300. The gearbox control unit and temperature sensor are housed inside the unit and cannot be replaced separately. Regular ATF+4 fluid changes every 60,000 km are critical. Early symptoms include jerking on pull-away and sluggish cold shifts.
Symptoms: Jerking on pull-away, delayed gear changes in city traffic, shift jolt - !! Oil Consumption from Piston Ring Wear from 100,000 km
The 2.0L Tigershark ED3 shares the piston ring issue of the Tigershark family. Oil consumption tends to increase at higher mileages above 100,000 km.
Symptoms: Increased oil consumption, blue smoke, oil level drops between changes
+ 1 more engine weaknesses + vehicle weaknesses
The 2.4L Tigershark MultiAir II suffered from an FCA-wide system fault with piston rings and head gasket, which led to a class action lawsuit ($8m settlement).
- !! Severe Oil Consumption from Piston Rings from 60,000 km
FCA used too-weak piston rings (low-tension rings) to reduce friction. Result: premature piston ring wear, oil burning and increased emissions across virtually all Tigershark engines.
Symptoms: Oil consumption over 1 l/1,000 km, blue smoke, oil level regularly low without visible leak - !! Head Gasket Leaking from 80,000 km
The 2.4L Tigershark seals the cylinder head poorly by design. Coolant loss and overheating result; repair requires specialist tools.
Symptoms: Coolant loss without visible leak, overheating gauge rising, white exhaust smoke - !! FCA Recall for Emissions Exceedance
FCA recalled around 1 million vehicles with the 2.4L Tigershark due to excessive exhaust emissions caused by the piston ring issue. Class action settled for $8 million.
Symptoms: Elevated emissions at inspection, oil consumption as a side effect
+ 1 more engine weaknesses + vehicle weaknesses
Vehicle Weaknesses
| Weakness | Cost | |
|---|---|---|
| Control Arm Rubber Bushes Too Soft (Steering Wheel Vibration) Fiat fitted some Freemont models with control arms using excessively soft rubber bushes. This causes severe steering wheel vibration at 90–130 km/h, which worsens at higher ambient temperatures. Symptoms: Severe steering wheel vibration between 90 and 130 km/h, independent of braking, worse in heat from 60,000 km | Low |
Alternatives
BMW X4 F26
Mid-Size SUV (2014–2018)
Infiniti QX60 L50
Mid-Size SUV (2014–2020)
Nissan X-Trail T32
Mid-Size SUV (2014–2017)
Toyota Highlander XU50
Mid-Size SUV (2014–2019)
Audi SQ5 8R
Mid-Size SUV (2013–2017)
Nissan Pathfinder R52
Mid-Size SUV (2013–2020)
Explore more
Known Problems and Issues +
A total of 19 weaknesses have been documented for the Fiat Freemont JC (2011–2016) — 12 engine-related and 7 vehicle-related. One problem engine: ERB (3.6L V6 Pentastar). Typical issues affect Suspension, Electronics, Body, HVAC.
Freemont (939B5, 2011–2016) — Be Careful: Turbocharger failure, EGR valve faulty, Particulate filter clogged. Power: 136 PS.
Freemont (939B5, 2011–2016) — Be Careful: Turbocharger failure, EGR valve faulty, Particulate filter clogged. Power: 163–170 PS.
Freemont (ERB, 2012–2016) — Stay Away!: Severe Oil Consumption from Piston Rings, Head Gasket Leaking, FCA Recall for Emissions Exceedance. Power: 280 PS.
Freemont (ED3, 2014–2016) — Be Careful: Overheating Risk from Cooling System Weakness, Automatic Transmission Failure (€10,300 Replacement Risk), Oil Consumption from Piston Ring Wear. Power: 170 PS.
What to watch out for with the Fiat Freemont? See the detailed listing of all engine and vehicle weaknesses in the sections above.
Frequently Asked Questions
What problems and weaknesses does the Fiat Freemont JC have? +
What should I look for when buying a used Fiat Freemont JC? +
Which engine is recommended? +
Which Fiat Freemont JC engine is the most fun? +
Is the Fiat Freemont JC worth buying used? +
What horsepower variants are available for the Fiat Freemont JC? +
Last updated: February 2026 · All information without guarantee