Buick Encore Gamma-II
Weaknesses, engine ratings and buying advice
The Encore is Buick's mini SUV on the Gamma-II platform — closely related to the Opel/Vauxhall Mokka and Chevy Trax. That makes it one of the few Buicks whose tech also ran in Europe. In the US it was long Buick's entry model and best-selling building block: small, city-friendly, high-seated.
The engines: Two 1.4-liter turbos, with a generation change between them. The early LUV (first generation, port injection, around 138 hp) has a long fault list: coking turbo oil line, PCV valve in the intake manifold, weeping water pump, cracking plastic coolant outlet, oil-leaking valve cover — and in the 2016–2017 model years, cracked pistons. Only buy this engine with care and an eye on the critical years. The later LE2 (direct injection, floating pistons, around 155 hp) is the better design: turbo failures and coolant consumption only appear beyond 160,000 km, plus oil consumption via valve stem seals and DI carbon buildup. Clear pick: LE2 over LUV, and avoid the 2016–2017 LUV.
Model years: 2013 to 2022. The critical piston years of the LUV are 2016–2017 — look especially closely here. Late LE2 builds are the safest choice.
Whole vehicle: The 6T40 transmission tends toward harsh shifting. On the electronics / ancillaries side: faulty purge valve, A/C compressor failure, a battery that drains overnight — and the GM-typical clearcoat flaking.
Test drive: On cold start and warm-up listen for engine noise, especially on the LUV of the critical years. Check the coolant level and the engine bay for moisture at the water pump / coolant outlet. Test the transmission for harsh shifts. Check the A/C for cooling, start the car after it's sat (battery). Inspect the paint at the edges.
Market 2026: More present in Europe as an Opel relative, rare as a Buick import. Roughly 6,000 to 14,000 euros depending on year. Insider pick: a late LE2 Encore with a well-kept history — a cheap, nimble city SUV with modest running costs.
Engine Overview
The Buick Encore Gamma-II is available with 2 engine variants — from 138 to 155 hp.
Next-generation 1.4-litre turbo four with direct injection, an aluminium valve cover and revised fully-floating pistons, around 155 hp. Architecturally a clean-sheet redesign rather than just a DI variant of its predecessor, with different bore and a forged crank. The notorious PCV and piston issues of the port-injected previous generation are largely resolved. In return, direct injection brings intake-valve carbon buildup as the typical DI concern, plus weeping coolant loss through the thermostat housing and hoses and age-related oil consumption at higher mileage. Early units were sensitive to low-speed pre-ignition, making Dexos full-synthetic oil mandatory. Notably more durable than the first generation.
- !! Turbo wear past 100k miles (LE2) from 160,000 km
The LE2 turbo lasts considerably longer than the previous generation's, but shows bearing and wastegate wear beyond 100,000 miles — accelerated by low coolant level from a leaking cooling system. P0299 underboost. Rebuildable or replace.
Symptoms: Whistling from turbo, power loss under load, blue smoke - !! Coolant consumption past 100k miles (LE2) from 160,000 km
Beyond high mileage the LE2 shows weeping coolant consumption through the thermostat housing, hoses and, in extreme cases, the head gasket. Ignored loss risks overheating and turbo damage — check coolant level regularly.
Symptoms: Reservoir level drops, no visible leak, possible overheating - !! Oil consumption from valve seals (LE2) from 130,000 km
Past 80,000 miles, LE2 engines show oil consumption from hardened valve stem seals and piston ring wear. Cat risk.
Symptoms: Blue smoke on cold start, oil level drops
+ 1 more engine weaknesses + vehicle weaknesses
First-generation 1.4-litre turbo four with port fuel injection and a composite valve cover housing the integrated PCV unit, around 138 hp. The central weak spot is the crankcase ventilation: the check valve in the intake manifold and the diaphragm in the valve cover age and fail on virtually every example, causing lean running, rough idle, whistling and oil mist in the intake tract. On top of that come a leaking water pump shaft seal at the weep hole, cracking plastic coolant outlets and coking turbo oil lines. Early model years also suffered cracked pistons. Adequate for daily use but maintenance-heavy, with plenty of small-item repair cost over time.
- !! Turbo oil feed line cokes up (LUV) from 100,000 km
Oil and coolant lines to the turbo coke or collapse: when the hot engine is shut off, the oil in the lines bakes into sludge and starves the turbo bearing. Result is a turbo smell and ultimately turbo failure. GM Special Coverage A212338300 covers 10 years/120,000 miles.
Symptoms: Burnt oil smell, power loss, blue smoke, turbo noise - !! Cracked pistons (LUV 2016–2017) from 90,000 km
Early pistons (2016-2017) crack at the ring lands, often triggered by low-speed pre-ignition (LSPI). The result is heavy oil consumption up to engine failure. GM revised the pistons afterwards; affected engines usually need replacement.
Symptoms: Heavy blue smoke, oil consumption over 1 qt per 1,000 mi, engine knock - !! Intake manifold PCV check valve failure (LUV) from 70,000 km
The orange rubber check valve in the intake manifold and the valve-cover diaphragm age and fail on virtually every engine: lean running, whistling, rough idle, oil mist in the intake. The valve can be sucked into the intake and burns up; the valve cover usually needs replacing in the same job.
Symptoms: Underboost codes, rough idle, whistling from intake, power loss
+ 3 more engine weaknesses + vehicle weaknesses
Vehicle Weaknesses
| Weakness | Cost | |
|---|---|---|
| 6T40 Transmission Harsh Shifting The 6T40 six-speed automatic tends to shift harshly and jerkily, with slip or flare when moving into or out of 2nd/6th gear. Per TSB PI0376A the cause is debris blocking oil supply to the 2-6 clutch regulator valve. Cleaning the channel/spacer plate and valve body often fixes it; severe cases need a rebuild. Symptoms: Hard shifts, shuddering on acceleration, engine stalls during R-D shift from 120,000 km | High |
Top Reported Issues
Alternatives
Cupra Formentor I
Compact SUV (2020–2024)
Cupra Ateca I-FL
Compact SUV (2020–2026)
Ford Mustang Mach-E I
Compact SUV (2020–2024)
Ford Escape IV
Compact SUV (2020–2024)
Hyundai Tucson NX4
Compact SUV (2020–2026)
Hyundai Kona OS-FL
Compact SUV (2020–2023)
Explore more
Known Problems and Issues +
A total of 15 weaknesses have been documented for the Buick Encore Gamma-II (2013–2022) — 10 engine-related and 5 vehicle-related. One problem engine: LUV (1.4L Turbo I4). Typical issues affect Gearbox, Other, HVAC, Electronics. Considered reliable: LE2 (1.4L Turbo DI I4).
Encore (LUV, 2013–2020) — Stay Away!: Turbo oil feed line cokes up (LUV), Cracked pistons (LUV 2016–2017), Intake manifold PCV check valve failure (LUV). Power: 138 PS.
What to watch out for with the Buick Encore? See the detailed listing of all engine and vehicle weaknesses in the sections above.
Frequently Asked Questions
What problems and weaknesses does the Buick Encore Gamma-II have? +
What should I look for when buying a used Buick Encore Gamma-II? +
Which engine is recommended? +
Which Buick Encore Gamma-II engine is the most reliable? +
Which Buick Encore Gamma-II engine is the most fun? +
Is the Buick Encore Gamma-II worth buying used? +
What horsepower variants are available for the Buick Encore Gamma-II? +
Last updated: February 2026 · All information without guarantee